<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>方案对比 on 温陵布衣</title><link>https://sikinzen.github.io/tags/%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E5%AF%B9%E6%AF%94/</link><description>Recent content in 方案对比 on 温陵布衣</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 23:04:15 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sikinzen.github.io/tags/%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E5%AF%B9%E6%AF%94/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>远程文件访问方案横评：向日葵 vs SMB vs Syncthing vs WebDAV</title><link>https://sikinzen.github.io/posts/remotefileaccesscomparison/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://sikinzen.github.io/posts/remotefileaccesscomparison/</guid><description>内网穿透打通后，从家里访问公司电脑的文件夹有哪些方式？本文实测对比向日葵远程文件传输、Windows SMB 共享、Syncthing P2P 同步和 WebDAV 四种方案，从速度、易用性、成本、安全等七个维度给出结论。</description></item><item><title>蒲公英 vs Tailscale：贝锐蒲公英内网穿透实战与方案对比</title><link>https://sikinzen.github.io/posts/oraypgyintranetpenetration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 23:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://sikinzen.github.io/posts/oraypgyintranetpenetration/</guid><description>Tailscale 内网穿透搭建完成后，顺手试了贝锐蒲公英客户端。本文记录实际使用过程（含 RPC 服务启动故障解决），并从速度、成本、维护三个维度对比蒲公英与 Tailscale 的优劣势，给出选型建议。</description></item></channel></rss>